Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date is a 1985 American short documentary film directed by Jim Wolpaw. It was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Short.
^ "NY Times: Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date". NY Times. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
Bande annonce de Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date
Suggestions de films similaires à Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date
Il y a 8954 ayant les mêmes genres cinématographiques, 3169 films qui ont les mêmes thèmes (dont 105 films qui ont les mêmes 2 thèmes que Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date), pour avoir au final 70 suggestions de films similaires.
Si vous avez aimé Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date, vous aimerez sûrement les films similaires suivants :
, 1h37 Réalisé parJaime Chávarri GenresDrame, Biographie, Documentaire ThèmesFilm sur un écrivain, Documentaire sur une personnalité Note78% The Panero is an illustrious traditional family from Astorga with literary links extending for generations. The patriarch, Leopoldo Panero, was the best regarded poet in Spain during his time. He died suddenly of a heart condition in 1962. Twelve years later, his widow, the still beautiful and elegant Felicidad Blanc, in the company of two of her sons Juan Luis and Michi, is shown in an outdoor homage to the late poet.
At the beginning of 2009, French filmmaker Jérémie Carboni followed French writer Daniel Pennac during rehearsals of Bartleby the scrivener's reading in Pépinière Opéra theatre in Paris.
, 1h20 Réalisé parEduardo Montes-Bradley GenresDocumentaire ThèmesFilm sur un écrivain, Documentaire sur une personnalité ActeursJorge Luis Borges, Osvaldo Bayer Note60% Montes-Bradley approaches Jorge Luis Borges on film. The portrait of Borges emerges as a counterpoint to the interviewees, some of which evoke scandal and most of which cut through stereotypes and presuppositions surrounding this key figure. The title of the film is a reference to a quote from the poem “Borges and I”, slightly modify to pay a tribute to the writer´s billings. The strategy employed by Montes-Bradley when it comes to Borges, a writer of whom almost everything has been said, consists on giving the word to the writer himself and to a select group of intellectuals who dwell on the margins of the Argentine cultural aparatik. Montes-Bradley, however, does not exhibit Borges like a painting to be admired but rather as counterpoint to the observations of others. We are neither the hapless witnesses of another saccharine celebration of Jorge Luis Borges, nor are we forced to endure another fashionable defrocking of an idol. The Borges that emerges from the interaction of the testimonies in this documentary surges from the heat of the debate, from the strong opinions, some certainly scandalous, most politically incorrect.